Abstract

Prognostics is an emerging science of predicting the health condition of a system and/or its components, based upon current and previous system status, with the ultimate goal of accurate prediction of the Remaining Useful Life (RUL). Based on this assumption, components/systems can be monitored to track the health state during operation. Acquired data are generally processed to extract relevant features related to the degradation condition of the component/system. Often, it is beneficial to combine several of these degradation parameters through an optimization process to develop a single parameter, called prognostic parameter, which can be trended to estimate the RUL. The approach adopted in this paper consists of a prognostic procedure which involves prognostic parameter generation and General Path Model (GPM) prediction. The Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) optimization methods will be used to develop suitable prognostic parameters from the selected features. Both time and frequency domain analysis will be investigated. Steady-state data obtained from electric motor accelerated degradation testing is used for method validation. Ten three-phase 5HP induction were run through temperature and humidity accelerated degradation cycles on a weekly basis. Of those, five presented similar degradation pathways due to bearing failure modes. The results show that the OLS method, on average, generated the best prognostic parameter performance using a combination of time domain features. However, the best single model performance was obtained using the GA methodology. In this case, the estimated RUL nearly coincided with the true RUL with an absolute percent error averaging under 5% near the end of life.

Highlights

  • The growing need to increase the competitiveness of industrial systems requires a reduction of maintenance costs, without compromising safe plant operation

  • The extracted features are fused to produce a prognostic parameter which is designed to be correlated with Remaining Useful Life (RUL)

  • This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 outlines some basic concepts about condition-based maintenance and health monitoring systems; Section 3 describes the prognostic procedure used in this paper for remaining useful life estimation; Section 4 reports the metrics used for evaluating prognostic methodology reliability; Section 5 presents the experimental data used for validating the prognostic methodology; Section 6 presents the results and discusses the capability of the prognostic methodology; and Section 7 summarizes the most significant conclusions

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The growing need to increase the competitiveness of industrial systems requires a reduction of maintenance costs, without compromising safe plant operation. Making accurate prognostic predictions allows benefits such as advanced scheduling of maintenance activities, proactive allocation of replacement parts and enhanced fleet deployment decisions based on the estimated progression of component life consumption (Li & Nilkitsaranont, 2009; Watson et al, 2011) For these reasons, prognostic health management is widely recognized as the direction of the future (Saxena et al, 2009a). This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 outlines some basic concepts about condition-based maintenance and health monitoring systems; Section 3 describes the prognostic procedure used in this paper for remaining useful life estimation; Section 4 reports the metrics used for evaluating prognostic methodology reliability; Section 5 presents the experimental data used for validating the prognostic methodology; Section 6 presents the results and discusses the capability of the prognostic methodology; and Section 7 summarizes the most significant conclusions

HEALTH MONITORING FOR CONDITION BASED MAINTENANCE
System Reliability and RUL Estimation
Type III
PROGNOSTIC PROCEDURE FOR REMAINING USEFUL LIFE ESTIMATION
Signal Processing for Feature Extraction
Feature Extraction from Time Domain Analysis
Feature Extraction from Frequency Domain Analysis
Prognostic Parameter Generation
Genetic Algorithm Approach for Prognostic Parameter Generation
Prognostic Model
METRICS FOR EVALUATING PROGNOSTIC PREDICTIONS
Improvements of Prognostic Model Metrics
Absolute Percent Error
EXPERIMENTAL DATA FOR METHODOLOGY VALIDATION
Feature Extraction from Degradation Data
Prognostic Parameter Generation from Extracted Features
RUL Estimation and Model Performance Evaluation
OLS estimation of the prognostic parameter
GA estimation of the prognostic parameter
Influence of Using a Higher Number of Data Points for Feature Extraction
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call