Sensitivity to orientation modulation in micropattern-based textures

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

We have measured the sensitivity of the human visual system to sinusoidal modulations of orientation in micropattern-based textured stimuli. The result is the orientation modulation function, or OMF, which describes this sensitivity as a function of the spatial frequency of orientation modulation. We found that the OMF was bandpass with peak sensitivity at spatial frequencies ranging between 0.06 and 0.2 c/deg, depending on the size of the micropatterns. The OMF was found to be scale invariant, that is its position on the spatial frequency axis did not change with viewing distance when spatial frequency was measured in object rather than retinal units. This scale invariance was shown to result from the visual system taking into account the scale rather than the density of the micropatterns as viewing distance was changed. It has been argued by Bergen [(1991) Vision and visual dysfunction (Vol. 10B) New York: Macmillan] that scale invariance in textures is a consequence of the coupling of mechanisms which detect textural features with those which detect local luminance contrasts. We reasoned that Gabor micropattern textures might therefore show narrower OMFs compared to line micropattern textures. However we found no difference in OMF bandwidth between the Gabor and line micropattern textures, suggesting that the line micropatterns were acting as selectively as the Gabor micropatterns for the spatial scale of the mechanisms which detected the orientation modulation. Evidence is presented which suggests that the mechanisms which detected the orientation modulation in our stimuli are non-linear. Finally we showed similar OMFs for sine-wave and square-wave modulations of micropattern orientation, and similar OMFs for modulations of micropattern with orientation about the horizontal and about the vertical, the direction of modulation in both cases being horizontal. The implications of these findings for the mechanisms involved in orientation-defined texture processing is discussed.