Abstract

What is the central question of this study? What is the relationship between the level of systemic hypercapnia and the magnitude of the additional hyperpnoea produced in response to a standardized level of muscle metaboreflex activation? What is the main finding and its importance? When a standardized activation of the muscle metaboreflex was combined with exposure to increasing levels of hypercapnia, the hyperpnoea this caused increased linearly. The concept of a synergistic interaction between the muscle metaboreflex and the central chemoreflex in humans is supported by this finding. Ventilation increases during muscle metaboreflex activation when postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) traps metabolites in resting human muscle, but only in conditions of concurrent systemic hypercapnia. We hypothesize that a linear relationship exists between the level of hypercapnia and the magnitude of the additional hyperpnoea produced in response to a standardized level of muscle metaboreflex activation. Fifteen male subjects performed four trials, in which the end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide ( ) was elevated by 1, 3, 7 or 10mmHg above resting values using a dynamic end-tidal forcing system. In each trial, subjects were seated in an isometric dynamometer designed to measure ankle plantar flexor force. Rest for 2 min in room air was followed by 15min of exposure to one of the four levels ofhypercapnia, at which 5min further rest was followed by 2 min of sustained isometric calf muscle contraction at 50% of predetermined maximal voluntary strength. Immediately before cessation of exercise, a cuff around the upper leg was inflated to a suprasystolic pressure to cause PECO for 3min, before its deflation and a further 5min of rest, concluding exposure to hypercapnia. The PECO consistently elevated mean arterial blood pressure by ∼10mmHg in all trials, indicating similar levels of metaboreflex activation. Increased ventilation during PECO was related to as described by the following linear regression equation: Change in minute ventilation (lmin-1 )=0.85× (mmHg)+0.80 (lmin-1 ). This finding supports our hypothesis and furthers the idea of a synergistic interaction between muscle metaboreflex activation and central chemoreflex stimulation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call