Abstract

Based on the blade chord and inlet velocity, the current computational study uses a linear vane cascade with a large filleted blade-endwall junction with a 2.01 x 105 Reynolds number. Three fillets with related profiles are explored. To evaluate the upshots of geometric differences in a fillet attached to the endwall flow-field, the height and endwall-width of the fillets are changed. The RANS k-ω turbulent model is used in the computations, and the results are compared to experimental results from a similar cascade without the fillet. The computed results of the secondary flow-field in the endwall region along the cascade are compared for baseline (no fillet) and filleted passages. As a result of diminished leading-edge and passage vortices, the fillets lower pitchwise pressure gradients, flow separation, axial vorticity, and overall pressure losses when compared to the baseline. The pros of fillets on endwall secondary flows are however unaffected by fillet's geometric changes.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.