Abstract

Ground motion input uncertainties may significantly affect structural seismic responses, resulting in an overestimation or underestimation of structural vulnerability results. To address this issue, a typical high-speed railway (HSR) bridge is taken as an example in this study, and a minimum quantity of ground motion inputs to balance computational costs and calculation accuracy. Seismic responses and vulnerabilities of multiple bridge components are first obtained using incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) and probabilistic seismic demand model (PSDM). The system vulnerability is then evaluated by using first-order bounds. Finally, the sensitivity of seismic vulnerability to the quantity of ground motion inputs is explained through statistical theory. Analytical results show that increasing the quantity of ground motion inputs from 3 to 7 can effectively reduce the calculation error from ±38% to ±15%. A minimum quantity of 11 ground motion inputs is strongly recommended for seismic vulnerability analysis to ensure acceptable calculation accuracy (≥94%).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.