Abstract
Background and ObjectiveVessel geometry and hemodynamics are intrinsically linked, whereby geometry determines hemodynamics, and hemodynamics influence vascular remodeling. Both have been used for testing clinical outcomes, but geometry/morphology generally has less uncertainty than hemodynamics derived from medical image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD). To provide clinical utility, CFD-based hemodynamic parameters must be robust to modeling errors and/or uncertainties, but must also provide useful information not more-easily extracted from shape alone. The objective of this study was to methodically assess the response of hemodynamic parameters to gradual changes in shape created using an unsupervised 3D shape interpolation method. MethodsWe trained the neural network NeuroMorph on 3 patient-derived intracranial aneurysm surfaces (labelled A, B, C), and then generated 3 distinct morph sequences (A→B, B→C, C→A) each containing 10 interpolated surfaces. From high-fidelity CFD simulation of these, we calculated a variety of common reduced hemodynamic parameters, including many previously associated with aneurysm rupture, and analyzed their responses to changes in shape, and their correlations. ResultsThe interpolated surfaces demonstrate complex, gradual changes in branch angles, vessel diameters, and aneurysm morphology. CFD simulation showed gradual changes in aneurysm jetting characteristics and wall-shear stress (WSS) patterns, but demonstrated a range of responses from the reduced hemodynamic parameters. Spatially and temporally averaged parameters including time-averaged WSS, time-averaged velocity, and low-shear area (LSA) showed low variation across all morph sequences, while parameters of flow complexity such as oscillatory shear, spectral broadening, and spectral bandedness indices showed high variation between slightly-altered neighboring surfaces. Correlation analysis revealed a great deal of mutual information with easier-to-measure shape-based parameters. ConclusionsIn the absence of large clinical datasets, unsupervised shape interpolation provides an ideal laboratory for exploring the delicate balance between robustness and sensitivity of nominal hemodynamic predictors of aneurysm rupture. Parameters like time-averaged WSS and LSA that are highly “robust” may, as a result, be effectively redundant to morphological predictors, whereas more sensitive parameters may be too uncertain for practical clinical use. Understanding these sensitivities may help identify parameters that are capable of providing added value to rupture risk assessment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.