Abstract

Changes in soil structure often accompany changes in management practices and may affect the effectiveness of these practices. Parameters are needed to quantify these changes. Our objective was to see if fractal dimensions derived from ‘aggregate bulk density–aggregate size’ and ‘aggregate number–aggregate size’ relationships could be applied to quantify such changes. The study was conducted at the Experimental Farm of the School of Agronomy and Forestry Engineering, National University of La Plata, Argentina. A Vertic Phaeozem soil was sampled at seven locations differing in long-term management practices. The ‘aggregate bulk density–aggregate size’ and ‘number of aggregates–aggregate size’ data were obtained for seven ranges of aggregate sizes. Differences in treatments were reflected by the fragmentation fractal dimension but not the mass fractal dimension. The lowest fragmentation fractal dimensions corresponded to plots under long-term no-tillage and the highest to plots with a history of cultivation of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) under water. The fragmentation fractal dimension reflected the differences in soil management whereas the mass fractal dimension appeared to be insensitive to those differences.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.