Abstract

SummaryBackgroundA common cause of lameness in horses is tenovaginitis of the digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS). Ultrasound and contrast tenography have become frequently used diagnostic tools for abnormalities in the DFTS, but are considered insufficiently accurate in describing specific lesions.ObjectivesTo determine the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic tenography (CTT) and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect artificial lesions within the DFTS.Study designBlinded laboratory study.MethodsUsing an arthroscopic hook knife, lesions (10–20 mm long and 3–5 mm deep; n = 52) were created tenoscopically in the superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT), deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT), manica flexoria (MF) and proximal scutum in 19 distal limb specimens. MRI and CTT were performed and images were reviewed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each modality and compared.ResultsComputed tomographic tenography and MRI identification of SDFT and MF lesions showed similar sensitivity (75% vs. 85%, respectively; p = 1) and specificity for MF lesions (96% for both). SDFT lesions specificity was similar for CTT versus MRI (85% vs. 77%, respectively; p = 0.88). For DDFT lesions, MRI sensitivity (62%) was higher compared to CTT (38%), although not statistically significant (p = 0.58). MRI specificity (92%) was lower than CTT (96%, p = 1). Lesions in the proximal scutum were more frequently identified by MRI compared to CTT (sensitivity: 93% vs. 57%, p = 0.17; specificity: 96% vs. 100%, p = 1).Main limitationsArtificial, small lesions were assessed. An incomplete arthroscopic portal seal resulted in pressure loss and contrast leakage.ConclusionsThe sensitivity and specificity of both modalities are good to excellent for the diagnosis of most artificially created lesions. CTT performed similarly to MRI in detecting SDFT and MF lesions. MRI showed a higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of DDFT and proximal scutum lesions. The results indicate a future application of CTT for the diagnosis of DFTS pathologies, whenever suspecting MF tears.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call