Abstract

Heavy metals in water sources can threaten human life and the environment. The analysis time, need for chemical reagents, and sample amount per analysis assist in monitoring contaminants. Application of the Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy for the investigation of heavy metal elements has significantly developed due to its cost effectiveness and accuracy. Use of chemometric models such as Partial Least Square (PLS) and Principle Component Regression Analysis (PCA) relate the multiple spectral intensities from numerous calibration samples to the recognized analytes. This study focused on the FT-IR calibration and quantification of heavy metals (Ag, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) in surveyed water sources. FT-IR measurements were compared with the atomic absorption spectrometer (AAS) measurements. Quantitative analysis methods, PCA and PLS, were used in the FT-IR calibration. The spectral analyses were done using the Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR-FTIR) technique on three river and four borehole water sources sampled within two seasons in QwaQwa, South Africa (SA). The PLS models had good R2 values ranging from 0.95 to 1 and the PCA models ranged from 0.98 to 0.99. Significant differences were seen at 0.001 and 0.05 levels between the PLS and PCA models for detecting Cd and Pb in the water samples. The PCA models detected Ag concentrations more (˂0 mg L−1 on selected sites). Both the PLS and PCA models had lower detection only for Zn ions mostly above 45 mg L−1 deviating from the AAS measurements (<0.020 mg L−1). The FT-IR spectroscopy demonstrated good potential for heavy metal determination purposes.

Highlights

  • The scale of contaminant migration from sanitation systems highly depends on variable climatic conditions, range of geological formations and soilscapes [1]

  • Concentrations of Ag (0 mg L−1 ) using the Principle Component Regression Analysis (PCA) method were similar in both water sources to the atomic absorption spectrometer (AAS) values (

  • Pb2+ and Ag+ ions are sorbed better on soils [34]. These effects were observed in our study because the results showed that heavy metal concentrations in groundwater sources and surface water sources were similar to boreholes and rivers, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The scale of contaminant migration from sanitation systems highly depends on variable climatic conditions, range of geological formations and soilscapes [1]. Heavy metals are non-biodegradable and persist in the aqueous solution as toxic substances within the environment [2]. The release of heavy metal wastes towards water resources can cause many physical, chemical and biological modifications [3]. Accumulation of heavy metals in water sources cause threats to human life and the environment [2]. Heavy metal level determination in water resources is important, since most of them are harmful even at low concentrations [3]. Heavy metals can be a challenge in catchment water resources for an extended time, even when the source has been remediated [2]. Heavy metal ions in solution tend to be difficult to remove with the use of traditional techniques [2,6].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.