Abstract
Sensitivity analysis (SA) has long been recognized as part of best practices to assess if any particular model can be suitable to inform decisions, despite its uncertainties. SA is a commonly used approach for identifying important parameters that dominate model behavior. As such, SA address two elementary questions in the modeling exercise, namely, how sensitive is the model to changes in individual parameter values, and which parameters or associated processes have more influence on the results. In this paper we report on a local SA performed on a complex marine biogeochemical model that simulates oxygen, organic matter and nutrient cycles (N, P and Si) in the water column, and well as the dynamics of biological groups such as producers, consumers and decomposers. SA was performed using a “one at a time” parameter perturbation method, and a color-code matrix was developed for result visualization. The outcome of this study was the identification of key parameters influencing model performance, a particularly helpful insight for the subsequent calibration exercise. Also, the color-code matrix methodology proved to be effective for a clear identification of the parameters with most impact on selected variables of the model.
Highlights
Sensitivity analysis (SA) can be basically described as the process to evaluate the contribution of input parameters to model behavior
We have developed a color-code matrix to visualize the results of the SA
The results are presented in tables for each functional group parameters and for the general parameters, where the impact of each parameter perturbation is expressed in a qualitative way
Summary
Sensitivity analysis (SA) can be basically described as the process to evaluate the contribution of input parameters to model behavior. There are uncertainties related with the parameterization and the nonlinearity of interactions within the model. This raises two basic questions: (a) how sensitive is the model to changes in individual parameter values; and (b) which parameters or associated processes have more influence on specific output variables? In complex models with a significant number of parameters, the SA may help in the selection of the most relevant parameters for the calibration process [4,7,13,14]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.