Abstract

The intention of this paper is to evaluate the sensitivity of the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) output to its input parameters. A global parameter sensitivity analysis is conducted in order to determine which parameters mostly affect the model simulation results. Two different methods of sensitivity analysis are applied in this study. The first one is the partial rank correlation coefficient (PRCC) which measures nonlinear but monotonic relationships between model inputs and outputs. The second one is based on the mutual information which provides a general measure of the strength of the non-monotonic association between two variables. Both methods are based on the Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) of the parameter space, and thus the same datasets can be used to obtain both measures of sensitivity. The utility of the PRCC and the mutual information analysis methods are illustrated by analyzing a complex SWMM model. The sensitivity analysis revealed that only a few key input variables are contributing significantly to the model outputs; PRCCs and mutual information are calculated and used to determine and rank the importance of these key parameters. This study shows that the partial rank correlation coefficient and mutual information analysis can be considered effective methods for assessing the sensitivity of the SWMM model to the uncertainty in its input parameters.

Highlights

  • Urban drainage models are widely used for planning, design and management of urban drainage systems

  • The Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) method was used to explore the effects of the input parameter uncertainty on the three output variables: the peak discharge (Qp), the total runoff volume (V) and the time to peak (Tp)

  • Sensitivity analysis of an urban drainage model with respect to uncertain model-input parameters is presented in this paper

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban drainage models are widely used for planning, design and management of urban drainage systems. Sensitivity analysis can be applied to identify the relative influence of each model input parameter on the model outputs. There are two main groups of sensitivity analysis: local and global approaches [2]. Local sensitivity analysis evaluates how the outputs change by varying one input parameter at a time. The global sensitivity analysis (GSA) considers a variation of all parameters simultaneously and evaluates their contribution to the uncertainty. The local approach has apparent limitations in complex hydrological models (e.g., SWMM), which often involve many nonlinear relationships between input and output variables [3,4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.