Sensitivities of Sensory Nerve Conduction Study Parameters in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract

It is generally accepted that median sensory nerve conduction studies are more sensitive than motor nerve conduction studies in the electrodiagnostic evidence of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). This study was conducted to compare the sensitivities of various parameters of sensory nerve conduction studies in the diagnosis of CTS. This prospective study included 88 consecutive patients (151 hands) with CTS and 106 control subjects. CTS was diagnosed clinically by two neurologists. Median sensory nerve responses with wrist stimulation were determined. The onset and peak latencies, peak-to-peak amplitudes, negative peak duration, and area were measured. The differences between the peak and onset latencies were also calculated as a measure of waveform temporal dispersion. Among each measured parameter, values between the 2.5th and the 97.5th percentile range of the control subjects served as the normal limits. Among the 151 hands with suspected CTS, five (3.3%) had normal electrodiagnostic studies and 146 (96.7%) had at least one abnormal electrodiagnostic study. Among the 146 hands with an abnormality, 138 had abnormal onset latency, 143 had abnormal peak latency, and 88 had abnormal difference between peak and onset latency. In addition, 87 had abnormal amplitude, 70 had abnormal duration, and 59 had abnormal area. The sensitivity was 91.4% for onset latency, 94.7% for peak latency, 58.3% for difference between peak and onset latency, 57.6% for amplitude, 46.4% for duration, and 39.1% for area. Our study shows that in patients with CTS, the most sensitive sensory nerve conduction parameter is the peak latency. Studying various additional sensory nerve conduction parameters did not significantly increase the diagnostic yield.