Abstract

Analytical devices that combine sensitive biological component with a physicochemical detector hold a great potential for various applications, e.g., environmental monitoring, food analysis or medical diagnostics. Continuous efforts to develop inexpensive sensitive biodevices for detecting target substances typically focus on the design of biorecognition elements and their physical implementation, while the methods for processing signals generated by such devices have received far less attention. Here, we present fundamental considerations related to signal processing in biosensor design and investigate how undemanding signal treatment facilitates calibration and operation of enzyme-based biodevices. Our signal treatment approach was thoroughly validated with two model systems: (i) a biodevice for detecting chemical warfare agents and environmental pollutants based on the activity of haloalkane dehalogenase, with the sensitive range for bis(2-chloroethyl) ether of 0.01–0.8 mM and (ii) a biodevice for detecting hazardous pesticides based on the activity of γ-hexachlorocyclohexane dehydrochlorinase with the sensitive range for γ-hexachlorocyclohexane of 0.01–0.3 mM. We demonstrate that the advanced signal processing based on curve fitting enables precise quantification of parameters important for sensitive operation of enzyme-based biodevices, including: (i) automated exclusion of signal regions with substantial noise, (ii) derivation of calibration curves with significantly reduced error, (iii) shortening of the detection time, and (iv) reliable extrapolation of the signal to the initial conditions. The presented simple signal curve fitting supports rational design of optimal system setup by explicit and flexible quantification of its properties and will find a broad use in the development of sensitive and robust biodevices.

Highlights

  • ObjectivesThis paper aims to fill the gap by comparing and contrasting simple methods with those employing mathematical modeling

  • There is great interest in the development of simple bioanalytical systems because of their high sensitivity, specificity, rapid responses, compatibility with on-line and on-site control configurations, and cost-effectiveness

  • The signal recorded by the device was processed using the standard analyses and nonlinear curve fitting, and resulting calibration curves and operational precision provided by those methods were compared

Read more

Summary

Objectives

This paper aims to fill the gap by comparing and contrasting simple methods with those employing mathematical modeling. The aim of this study was to rigorously compare different methods of signal analysis and demonstrate the advantages of using mathematical data treatment techniques to improve the performance of newly developed bioanalytical devices

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call