Abstract

BackgroundCandidiasis is one of the most important among recurrent invasive yeast infections in patients, thus antifungal treatment becomes a challenge. AimsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of clinical Candida albicans isolates from blood cultures to fluconazole, amphotericin B and anidulafungin, in a hospital from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. MethodsThe susceptibility of 153 isolates to the 3 drugs mentioned was tested according to Clinical and Laboratory Standars Institute. Minimal inhibitory and fungicidal concentrations (MIC, MFC, respectively) of each drug were determined, as well as the epidemiological cutoff value (ECV). ResultsAll of the isolates were susceptible to anidulafungin, MIC and MFC≤1μg/ml; however, when compared with ECV, 3% of the isolates exhibited higher values against fluconazole, 96% were susceptible, 3% susceptible dose-dependent, and 1% resistant. Also, it was observed that 21% of the isolates exhibited higher values than ECV. One isolate was resistant to amphotericin B; the other ones, susceptible, based on the MFC; furthermore, 1.5% of the isolates exhibited higher values. ConclusionsC. albicans isolates exhibited more susceptibility to anidulafungin, and 90% of them (MIC90) exhibited the lowest values against amphotericin B. Based on ECV and Pfaller classification, isolates could be resistant to fluconazole, demonstrating the importance of the combination of these parameters.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.