Abstract
Our intent was to provide a methodological overview of the primary data collection process in support of the other articles in this special issue. We documented and illustrated the use of a data collection and analysis suite, SenseMaker, that was designed to collect and work with narrative fragments. The approach presented adds a new and inherently mixed tool to the mixed methods toolbox. Despite its novelty and potential utility, little has been written in the academic literature on the application of SenseMaker to complex problems. To the best of our knowledge, the approach has not been used in relation to climate change or climate change adaptation and has not been presented in the mixed methods literature. We sought to contribute to filling this gap through describing the approach used to generate the data that underpin the articles in this special feature. Our purpose was to illustrate some of the potential and most notable challenges of using the SenseMaker data collection and analysis process in a complex domain through examining adaptation to climate change. Our overview was not exhaustive but rather sought to highlight capabilities and challenges through examining experiences of adaptation from a stages of change perspective. SenseMaker provides a remarkably powerful tool for the capture of micronarratives of complex phenomena such as climate change. The capacity to have respondents interpret, i.e., make sense of, their own narratives is an important innovation that provides one plausible solution to the problem of analysts coding narratives. Analytically, however, SenseMaker is relatively weak for those seeking strong statistical support for analyses and provides no capability for analyzing the narratives themselves.
Highlights
Climate change, we are told, is a dramatic example of a complex or wicked problem (Australian Public Services Commission 2007b, Lazarus 2009, Levin et al 2012)
Acknowledging that SenseMaker is designed to support action, we focus our explorations on identifying what actions could be taken to enhance the likelihood that people would adapt to climate change
We adopt the perspective of a social group, such as a government agency or a nongovernmental organization, that seeks to enhance the likelihood of adaptation
Summary
We are told, is a dramatic example of a complex or wicked problem (Australian Public Services Commission 2007b, Lazarus 2009, Levin et al 2012). Complexity theory provides a potentially useful orientation to understanding and acting within the emergent flux of representations, positions, and actions to achieve desirable social outcomes in relation to climate change adaptation (Australian Public Services Commission 2007b, Milne 2015). We acknowledge that despite the availability of these approaches, as well as a number of others, for application to problems in the complicated domain, knowledge, data, models, or interpretations are often contested It is when we consider phenomena in the complex domain that multiple perspectives dominate the conceptual stage. Our purpose is to illustrate some of the potential and some of the most notable challenges of using the SenseMaker data collection and analysis process in a complex domain through examining adaptation to climate change. Thirty seven percent of the respondents identified themselves as being members of the general public, 27% identified themselves as being government employees, and 19% identified themselves as scientists, academics, or researchers (Table 1)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
