Sense and Word in Liturgical Language

Abstract

When E. Gordon Craig in 1922 wrote,“To man words come easiest and earliest to lie with. So that now in this twentieth century nearly all speech is a lie. I would not go so far as to laughingly admit that speech of that kind was an art. I should rather call it a mess.”he was making the distinction between the role of language as a vehicle for communicating essentials, and the role of language as an art-form. As a theatrical designer who was to revolutionise traditional concepts of theatre, he was keenly aware of the difficulty in using language to represent exactly those things we wish to communicate to others. One word may have a variety of meanings, or because of constant use in a multitude of ways, have lost much of its original meaning. Reliance on the word itself is therefore not always the best or most effective guide to meaning. He continues:“Once a merely natural thing—it became an art; but when it exceeded its natural term of life, having talked itself hoarse-black in the face—the silver of speech rubbed off and we came to the lead underneath, and inside the lead . . . lies.”