Abstract

W tHERE seniority is completely incorporated into a personnel system, it is regarded by both the employer and the employees as one of the most important working conditions in the collective agreement.2 Among union officials and also among those employees who are thoroughly union conscious there are many who consider the seniority principle scarcely, if at all, less important than the wages and hours clauses of the collective agreement. These opinions are of long standing. As much as 25 or 30 per cent of the space in railroad trainand engine-service collective agreements, or schedules as they are called, is occupied by statements involving various phases of the seniority rule. In other industries and in less complicated branches of the railroad service the percentage of space occupied by seniority stipulations is somewhat less. Within the past few years the importance of seniority has been further demonstrated by the increased attention it has received from unions. In the railroad industry, where seniority first received full recognition, the depression has necessitated many adjustments which, in turn, have affected the seniority arrangements. On the other hand, in industries where collective bargaining has not been the custom-and hence seniority has not been recognized-both A.F. of L. and C.I.O. labor factions of late have placed the seniority principle among the first concessions to be obtained from employers.4

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.