Abstract

Comparative studies were carried out using two different insect cell lines, Aedes albopictus and Estigmene acrea, for Tipula iridescent virus (TIV) propagation. Light microscope autoradiography showed viral DNA present in viroplasmic centers (VCs) and an inhibition of nuclear DNA synthesis. These VCs appeared to be morphologically similar in both cell lines when examined by light and electron microscopy. Radiolabeled cDNA was synthesized from RNA samples obtained from infected cells at different times after infection and hybridized to TIV DNA digested with various restriction endonucleases. The results indicated that the pattern of transcription and the kinetics of TIV infection were qualitatively similar in both cell lines. The major TIV DNA components, L (>174 kbp) and S1 (10.8 kbp) that are found in virions in approximately equivalent amounts, were made in both infected cell lines. However, the infected cell lines produced S1 DNA at higher levels relative to L than in virions. The cDNA hybridization studies also revealed that the S1 DNA has sequences that are transcribed and are TIV specific. While VC morphology, levels of L and S1 DNA synthesis, transcription, and capsid protein synthesis were similar in both cell lines, time course electron microscope studies revealed that progeny virions were detected only in the VCs of E. acrea cells and not in the VCs of A. albopictus cells, even by 96 hr p.i. These data suggest that the A. albopictus C6/36 cell line is semipermissive for TIV replication.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.