Abstract

The quality of the endothelial cell layer is a major criterion for the approval of organ-cultured human donor-corneas for transplantation. We wanted to compare the predictive capacities of initial endothelial density and endothelium cell morphology for the approval of donor corneas for transplantation and for the clinical outcome after transplantation. The endothelial density and endothelium morphology in organ culture were examined by semiautomatic assessment of 1031 donor corneas. We performed a statistical analysis for correlations of donor-data and cultivation parameters regarding their predictive capacities for the final approval of donor corneas for transplantation and the clinical outcome of 202 transplanted patients. Corneal endothelium cell density proved to be the only parameter with a certain predictive capacity with regard to the final decision, whether donor corneas are suitable for transplantation - however, the correlation was low (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.655). Endothelial cell morphology lacked any predictive power (AUC = 0.597). The clinical outcome regarding visual acuity seemed to be largely independent from both corneal endothelial cell density and morphology. Sub-analyses on transplanted patients stratified for their diagnoses vindicated these findings. Higher endothelial density (above a cut-off level of 2000 cells/mm2), as well as better endothelial morphology do not seem to be critical for transplant-corneal functionality in organ culture and up to 2years after transplantation. Comparable long-term studies on graft survival are recommended to determine, whether the present endothelial density cut-off levels might be too stringent.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.