Abstract

BackgroundHydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) most commonly requires experimental determination (i.e., scouting) in order to select an optimal chromatographic medium for purifying a given target protein. Neither a two-step purification of untagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) from crude bacterial lysate using sequential HIC and size exclusion chromatography (SEC), nor HIC column scouting elution profiles of GFP, have been previously reported.Methods and ResultsBacterial lysate expressing recombinant GFP was sequentially adsorbed to commercially available HIC columns containing butyl, octyl, and phenyl-based HIC ligands coupled to matrices of varying bead size. The lysate was fractionated using a linear ammonium phosphate salt gradient at constant pH. Collected HIC eluate fractions containing retained GFP were then pooled and further purified using high-resolution preparative SEC. Significant differences in presumptive GFP elution profiles were observed using in-line absorption spectrophotometry (A395) and post-run fluorimetry. SDS-PAGE and western blot demonstrated that fluorometric detection was the more accurate indicator of GFP elution in both HIC and SEC purification steps. Comparison of composite HIC column scouting data indicated that a phenyl ligand coupled to a 34 µm matrix produced the highest degree of target protein capture and separation.ConclusionsConducting two-step protein purification using the preferred HIC medium followed by SEC resulted in a final, concentrated product with >98% protein purity. In-line absorbance spectrophotometry was not as precise of an indicator of GFP elution as post-run fluorimetry. These findings demonstrate the importance of utilizing a combination of detection methods when evaluating purification strategies. GFP is a well-characterized model protein, used heavily in educational settings and by researchers with limited protein purification experience, and the data and strategies presented here may aid in development other of HIC-compatible protein purification schemes.

Highlights

  • Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) is a wellestablished technique that separates a recombinant or endogenous protein of interest from crude cellular lysate based on differences in protein surface hydrophobicity

  • Conducting two-step protein purification using the preferred HIC medium followed by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) resulted in a final, concentrated product with .98% protein purity

  • In-line absorbance spectrophotometry was not as precise of an indicator of green fluorescent protein (GFP) elution as post-run fluorimetry. These findings demonstrate the importance of utilizing a combination of detection methods when evaluating purification strategies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) is a wellestablished technique that separates a recombinant or endogenous protein of interest from crude cellular lysate based on differences in protein surface hydrophobicity. It is often chosen as a purification method for isolating proteins that lack an affinity tag or when other chromatographic methods such as ion exchange chromatography (IEX) or size exclusion chromatography (SEC) fail to provide adequate resolution [1]. Available HIC media differ in functional group chemical structures, hydrophobicities, and densities, as well as size of the inert matrix beads to which the functional groups are attached These differences in HIC media combine to produce unique chromatographic elution profiles. Neither a two-step purification of untagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) from crude bacterial lysate using sequential HIC and size exclusion chromatography (SEC), nor HIC column scouting elution profiles of GFP, have been previously reported

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call