Abstract

A number of methodologies are currently being exploited in order to dramatically increase the composition space explored in the design of new battery materials. This is proving necessary as commercial Li-ion battery materials have become increasingly high-performing and complex. For example, commercial cathode materials have quinary compositions with a sixth element in the coating, while a very large number of contenders are still being considered for solid electrolytes, with most of the periodic table being at play. Furthermore, the promise of accelerated design by computation and machine learning (ML) are encouraging, but they both ultimately require large amounts of quality experimental data either to fill in holes left by the computations or to be used to improve the ML models. All of this leads researchers to increase experimental throughputs. This perspective focuses on semiautomated experimental approaches where automation is only utilized in key steps where absolutely necessary in order to overcome bottlenecks while minimizing costs. Such workflows are more widely accessible to research groups as compared to fully automated systems, such that the current perspective may be useful to a wide community. The most essential steps in automation are related to characterization, with X-ray diffraction being a key bottleneck. By analyzing published workflows of both semi- and fully automated workflows, it is found herein that steps handled by researchers during the synthesis are not prohibitive in terms of overall throughput and may lead to greater flexibility, making more synthesis routes possible. Examples will be provided in this perspective of workflows that have been optimized for anodes, cathodes, and electrolytes in Li batteries, the vast majority of which are also suitable for battery technologies beyond Li.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call