Abstract
Background99mTc-HMDP scintigraphy has proved its efficacy in non-invasive diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and is currently interpreted according to the Perugini qualitative assessment. Several semi-quantitative indices have been proposed to overcome inherent possible limitations of visual grading. Our aim was to comparatively evaluate six different indices and their diagnostic performance. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed scintigraphy of 76 patients (53 ATTR, 12 AL, 11 LVH) who underwent diagnostic evaluation at our centre. ROC-curve analysis was performed to identify optimal cut-off and relative diagnostic accuracy of six different indices (of which one was proposed for the first time), both in identifying CA patients and in discriminating patients according to their Perugini score. ResultsHeart/Whole-body ratios proved to be the most accurate (100%) in identifying CA patients. Heart/Pelvis ratio (with soft tissue background correction) offered acceptable accuracy (98%), with the largest area under the curve (AUC) (0.98) in discriminating patients with Perugini ≥ 2. Heart/Contralateral Lung ratio confirmed to be exposed to confounding background noise in case of simultaneous lung uptake. Heart/Skull ratio had the worst performance, with six false-negative patients in ATTR identification. ConclusionHeart/Whole-body ratios may be robust and effective semi-quantitative indices for the evaluation of CA by means of scintigraphy
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
