Abstract

The goal of this study was to develop a semi-automated prediction approach of target shifts using machine learning architecture (MLA) with anatomical features for prostate radiotherapy. Our hypothesis was that anatomical features between planning computed tomography (pCT) and pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images could be used to predict the target, i.e. clinical target volume (CTV) shifts, with small errors. The pCT and daily CBCT images of 20 patients with prostate cancer were selected. The first 10 patients were employed for the development, and the second 10 patients for a validation test. The CTV position errors between the pCT and CBCT images were determined as reference CTV shifts (teacher data) after an automated bone-based registration. The anatomical features associated with rectum, bladder and prostate were calculated from the pCT and CBCT images. The features were fed as the input with the teacher data into five MLAs, i.e. three types of artificial neural networks, support vector regression (SVR) and random forests. Since the CTV shifts along the left–right direction were negligible, the MLAs were developed along the superior–inferior and anterior–posterior directions. The proposed framework was evaluated from the residual errors between the reference and predicted CTV shifts. In the validation test, the mean residual error with its standard deviation was 1.01 ± 1.09 mm in SVR using only one feature (one click), which was associated with positional difference of the upper rectal wall. The results suggested that MLAs with anatomical features could be useful in prediction of CTV shifts for prostate radiotherapy.

Highlights

  • Among men, prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide [1, 2]

  • The results suggested that machine learning architecture (MLA) with anatomical features could be useful in prediction of clinical target volume (CTV) shifts for prostate radiotherapy

  • In prostate Intensitymodulated radiotherapy (IMRT), patient positioning has been performed on image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) systems based on the image registration between the planning computed tomography

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide [1, 2]. External-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the treatment selected for about one-third of patients with localized PCa, and this proportion increases with age [3]. Intensitymodulated radiotherapy (IMRT) provides a highly conformal radiation dose distribution while minimizing the toxicity to the surrounding normal organs, and IMRT has become the most common form of EBRT delivery for PCa [4]. The target (prostate and/or seminal vesicles) positions during treatment (fractions) may change with variations in the positions, volumes and/or shapes of the rectum and bladder [5, 6]. In prostate IMRT, patient positioning has been performed on image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) systems based on the image registration between the planning computed tomography 285.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call