Abstract

While the analysis and understanding of multispectral (i.e., optical) remote sensing images have made considerable progress during the last decades, the automated analysis of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite images still needs some innovative techniques to support nonexpert users in the handling and interpretation of these big and complex data. In this article, we present a survey of existing multispectral and SAR land cover image datasets. To this end, we demonstrate how an advanced SAR image analysis system can be designed, implemented, and verified that is capable of generating semantically annotated classification results (e.g., maps) as well as local and regional statistical analytics such as graphical charts. The initial classification is made based on Gabor features and followed by class assignments (labeling). This is followed by inclusion. This can be accomplished by the inclusion of expert knowledge via active learning with selected examples, and the extraction of additional knowledge from public databases to refine the classification results. Then, based on the generated semantics, we can create new topic models, find typical country-specific phenomena and distributions, visualize them interactively, and present significant examples including confusion matrices. This semiautomated and flexible methodology allows several annotation strategies, the inclusion of dedicated analytics procedures, and can generate broad as well as detailed semantic (multi-)labels for all continents, and statistics or models for selected countries and cities. Here, we employ knowledge graphs and exploit ontologies. These components could already be validated successfully. The proposed methodology can also be adapted to other SAR instruments with different resolutions as well as to multispectral images.

Highlights

  • E ARTH observation (EO) archive volumes are approaching the zettabyte scale, and are only exploited by about 5% to 10% (see [25] for the trends and a prediction of the EO data volume to be stored at the German Aerospace Center (DLR) from 2010 to 2030).EO digital asset management and analysis prototypes exist at many institutions to help users find elements of interest based on Manuscript received April 7, 2021; revised May 12, 2021; accepted May 12, 2021

  • The entire dataset is analyzed identically by the proposed method using the same patch size (160×160 pixels), the same feature extraction method (Gabor filters with five scales and six orientations), the same classifier and kernel (SVM with chi-square tests), and the same user performing the semantic labeling of the retrieved classes

  • We were able to define a nomenclature adapted to high-resolution synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images where we applied a hierarchical semantic annotation scheme with three levels with a total of 150 classes/categories, of which nine basic classes belong to our level-1, 73 classes belong to level-2, and 68 classes belong to level-3 [1]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

E ARTH observation (EO) archive volumes are approaching the zettabyte scale, and are only exploited by about 5% to 10% (see [25] for the trends and a prediction of the EO data volume to be stored at the German Aerospace Center (DLR) from 2010 to 2030). The purpose of this article is not to present the semantic annotation methodology (only briefly presented in this article) [1], but rather how semantic labels can be created, their statistics, the analysis of correlations between given semantic classes, the specificity of several geographical areas or countries, how to create reliable benchmark datasets, and the creation of certain models that characterize a city or a country Based on these results, as future work, we will analyze the possibility of using several high-resolution SAR models (of a commercial sensor such as TerraSAR-X [38]) to transfer the knowledge (from a noncommercial sensor such as Sentinel-1 [39]) and to generate large-scale benchmark datasets for urban areas [2]. Appendix IV gives a list of semantic classes that are retrieved in our dataset with typical examples

SURVEY OF EXISTING SEMANTIC DATASETS
CHARACTERISTICS OF OUR BUILT-FOR-URBAN SAR DATASET
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF OUR SEMANTIC ANNOTATION METHODOLOGY
Conclusion
DISCUSSIONS OF OUR SEMANTIC FINDINGS
Country Model Based on the Retrieved Semantic Classes
Ontology Model for High-Resolution SAR Images
Domain Ontologies and Knowledge-Graph Representation
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Remote Sensing Multispectral Datasets
Findings
Remote Sensing SAR Datasets
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call