Abstract
In the debate between internalists and externalists in philosophy of language and philosophy of psychology, internalists such as Jerry Fodor have invoked a strong a priori argument to show that externalist descriptions can play no role in a science of the human mind and of human action. Shifting the ground of the debate from psychology to social science, I try to undermine Fodor's reasoning. I also point to a role for externalist theorising in the area where the socio-semantic theory of the ‘division of linguistic labour’ makes contact with traditional micro-sociological theorising.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have