Abstract
The stimulus suffix effect is investigated when it follows an auditory memory list in which rated meaningfulness was manipulated at the final serial position. A verbal suffix disrupts the terminal list item compared with a noise suffix, but rated meaningfulness affects recall performance significantly despite the presence of a verbal suffix. With ordered recall, there is some evidence that a verbal suffix disrupts items rated low in meaningfulness to a greater extent (Expt. I); this interaction does not show when serial order recall is stipulated (Expt. II). The effect of rated meaningfulness with a verbal stimulus suffix eliminates a model in which information about the final item is retrieved exclusively from precategorical acoustic storage. The paper discusses two propositions about the preliminary stages of acoustic analysis and encoding in the absence of focal attention.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.