Abstract
Although better known as a novelist, Virginia Woolf started her professional life as a woman critic: as a woman, she strove to overcome initial suspicions that her sex, youth and inexperience could arouse in the editing and publishing worlds; as a critic she encountered the opposition of her male contemporaries for subverting in her essays established critical values which Woolf did not wish to perpetuate. Within Woolf’s critical work, there stand —most often neglected by scholars— her “conversational essays”, a literary form that emphasises the spontaneity of oral speech as well as dialogic plurality, reaching back in a long tradition from Plato to William Hazlitt, Michel de Montaigne and Oscar Wilde. The use of conversation, itself a hybrid poised between written and oral discourse, allows the voices of outsiders and raiders to emerge: Woolf proposed the conversational essay as a countercanon to what she defined as the “massive masculine achievement”. It is from this process of exchange and collision that truth bursts forth, knowledge is developed and inclusion and insularity finally overcome.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
