Abstract

Even though many manufacturers integrate remanufacturing into existing business models, it should be noted that such efforts are usually accompanied by a major concern for cannibalization of new product sales from remanufactured products. To deal with this problem, many manufacturers, such as Dell, adopt a “two-roof policy” where the sale of new products takes place in a store and their remanufactured products in another. However, in contrast, some manufacturers, including Apple and HP, adopt a “one-roof policy”, by which all new and remanufactured products are sold through one store/chain. Although the literature on remanufacturing has extensively addressed sustainability issues within operations management, little attention has been paid to how “differentiated roof policy” for the marketing of remanufactured products affects sustainability issues. To fill this gap, in this paper, the authors develop two theoretical models in which manufacturers have the flexibility to distribute new and remanufactured products (1) through a one-roof policy (Model O) or (2) through a two-roof policy (Model T), respectively, and strive to address the question of how differentiated roof policies impact sustainability issues related to remanufacturing operations. Among other results, the central result suggests that, if the manufacturers care about economic performance, distributing both products through a two-roof policy is an advantageous strategy. Conversely, if they care about environmental sustainability, one roof is the preferred strategy.

Highlights

  • The global business community has experienced significant momentum regarding interest in the sustainable movement [1]

  • Some manufacturers adopt a “one-roof policy”, by which all new and remanufactured products are sold through one store/chain

  • The authors develop two theoretical models in which original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) with the potential flexibility to distribute new and remanufactured units: (1) Through a one-roof policy, in which all new and remanufactured products are sold through one store/chain (Model O); or (2) through a two-roof policy, Sustainability 2018, 10, 2427

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The global business community has experienced significant momentum regarding interest in the sustainable movement [1]. Legislations, including the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (European Union), Home Appliance Recycling Law (Japan), and Regulation on the Administration of the Recovery and Disposal of Waste Electrical and Electronic Products (China), have introduced this awareness and make take-back, recycling, and remanufacturing a necessity for original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). One of the lasting effects of this movement is the fact that numerous brand name manufacturers have created business models in which remanufacturing is an integral part [3]. Xerox Corporation, for example, has engaged in remanufacturing with its copiers and has successfully remanufactured over 230,000 equipment parts, which has saved about $6 million in manufacturing costs in 2008 to 2009 in Australia [4]. Similar cases appear in IBM [6], Canon [7], Hewlett-Packard [8], and more

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.