Abstract

The aim of this paper is investigate the feasibility of automatically training supervised methods, such as k-nearest neighbor (kNN) and principal component discriminant analysis (PCDA), and to segment the four subcortical brain structures: caudate, thalamus, pallidum, and putamen. The adoption of supervised classification methods so far has been limited by the need to define a representative training dataset, operation that usually requires the intervention of an operator. In this work the selection of the training data was performed on the subject to be segmented in a fully automated manner by registering probabilistic atlases. Evaluation of automatically trained kNN and PCDA classifiers that combine voxel intensities and spatial coordinates was performed on 20 real datasets selected from two publicly available sources of multispectral magnetic resonance studies. The results demonstrate that atlas-guided training is an effective way to automatically define a representative and reliable training dataset, thus giving supervised methods the chance to successfully segment magnetic resonance brain images without the need for user interaction.

Highlights

  • Brain tissue classification is an important topic in magnetic resonance (MR) brain image analysis

  • The aim of this paper is investigate the feasibility of automatically training supervised methods, such as k-nearest neighbor and principal component discriminant analysis (PCDA), and to segment the four subcortical brain structures: caudate, thalamus, pallidum, and putamen

  • The results demonstrate that atlas-guided training is an effective way to automatically define a representative and reliable training dataset, giving supervised methods the chance to successfully segment magnetic resonance brain images without the need for user interaction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brain tissue classification is an important topic in magnetic resonance (MR) brain image analysis. The segmentation of the minor brain structures presents a higher degree of difficulty due to a variable and often lower contrast between these structures and adjacent tissues, which limits intensity-based classification even in the presence of multispectral data [6,7,8]. Supervised classification methods have shown very good results for the segmentation of MR brain images; they require the construction of a training dataset to learn how to classify new data. This represents a time consuming and expensive task, which can be achieved only by expert operators who should manually label a certain number of MR studies. The method is based on the use of probabilistic atlases to guide the selection of a training dataset within the same MR study to be classified

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call