Abstract

A thorough self-similarity analysis is presented to investigate the properties of self-similarity for the outer layer of compressible turbulent boundary layers. The results are validated using the compressible and quasi-incompressible direct numerical simulation (DNS) data shown and discussed in the first part of this study; see Wenzelet al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 880, 2019, pp. 239–283). The analysis is carried out for a general set of characteristic scales, and conditions are derived which have to be fulfilled by these sets in case of self-similarity. To evaluate the main findings derived, four sets of characteristic scales are proposed and tested. These represent compressible extensions of the incompressible edge scaling, friction scaling, Zagarola–Smits scaling and a newly defined Rotta–Clauser scaling. Their scaling success is assessed by checking the collapse of flow-field profiles extracted at various streamwise positions, being normalized by the respective scales. For a good set of scales, most conditions derived in the analysis are fulfilled. As suggested by the data investigated, approximate self-similarity can be achieved for the mean-flow distributions of the velocity, mass flux and total enthalpy and the turbulent terms. Self-similarity thus can be stated to be achievable to a very high degree in the compressible regime. Revealed by the analysis and confirmed by the DNS data, this state is predicted by the compressible pressure-gradient boundary-layer growth parameter$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$, which is similar to the incompressible one found by related incompressible studies. Using appropriate adaption,$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$values become comparable for compressible and incompressible pressure-gradient cases with similar wall-normal shear-stress distributions. The Rotta–Clauser parameter in its traditional form$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{K}=(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{K}^{\ast }/\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}_{w})(\text{d}p_{e}/\text{d}x)$with the kinematic (incompressible) displacement thickness$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{K}^{\ast }$is shown to be a valid parameter of the form$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$and hence still is a good indicator for equilibrium flow in the compressible regime at the finite Reynolds numbers considered. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that the often neglected derivative of the length scale,$\text{d}L_{0}/\text{d}x$, can be incorporated, which was found to have an important influence on the scaling success of common ‘low-Reynolds-number’ DNS data; this holds for both incompressible and compressible flow. Especially for the scaling of the$\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}}\widetilde{u^{\prime \prime }v^{\prime \prime }}$stress and thus also the wall shear stress$\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}_{w}$, the inclusion of$\text{d}L_{0}/\text{d}x$leads to palpable improvements.

Highlights

  • Introduced by Rotta (1950), Clauser (1954) and Townsend (1956b), the concept of self-similar equilibrium boundary layers is one of the most successful approaches to understand turbulent boundary layers (TBLs) with pressure gradients (PGs) in incompressible flow

  • It can be expected that the compressible PG TBL can be characterized by a certain degree of self-similarity due to the close relation between the incompressible Reynolds-averaged and Favre-averaged turbulent boundary-layer equations, there is no comparable theory for compressible flows as the one provided by Rotta (1950) and Clauser (1954) for incompressible flows

  • Most arguments related to the possible self-similarity of compressible PG TBLs are based on Morkovin’s hypothesis, which essentially states that compressible boundary layers ‘follow the incompressible pattern’

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Introduced by Rotta (1950), Clauser (1954) and Townsend (1956b), the concept of self-similar equilibrium boundary layers is one of the most successful approaches to understand turbulent boundary layers (TBLs) with pressure gradients (PGs) in incompressible flow. While the displacement thickness δ∗ is usually used for the length scale L, the kinematic (incompressible) displacement thickness δK∗ or the momentum thickness θ as well as an inner-layer pressure-gradient parameter (νw/(ρwu3τ ))(dpe/dx) can be found in the literature (Fernholz, Finley & Mikulla 1981) It is often mentioned, that none of these definitions contains the influence of the wall-normal PG, which is often mentioned to be important with increasing Mach numbers, especially for cases with wall curvature (see Fernholz et al 1989; Smith & Smits 1995)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.