Abstract

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article LettersFull AccessSelf-Reported Suicidal Ideation as a Predictor of Suicidal BehaviorGregory E Simon, M.D., M.P.H.Gregory E SimonSearch for more papers by this author, M.D., M.P.H.Published Online:1 Jul 2019https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.70704AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail IN REPLY: Our data are certainly not adequate to assess the accuracy or utility of item 9 of the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to identify risk of suicide death for people with psychotic disorders.But we believe that PHQ-9 item 9 can be useful in identifying risk of suicide attempt—in the general population of mental health outpatients and for people with psychotic disorders. Among people with a diagnosis of psychotic disorder, a response of “nearly every day” to item 9 at an outpatient visit identifies persons with a 3.5% risk of suicide attempt in the following 90 days. In general medicine, we routinely use and act on risk prediction tools with lower positive predictive value. For example, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends tamoxifen for women with a predicted risk of breast cancer exceeding 3% over 5 years (1) and recommends statins for people with predicted risk of a cardiovascular event exceeding 10% over 10 years (2).The practical question for clinicians is not “Will this patient attempt suicide in the next 90 days?” but “Is this patient’s risk of self-harm high enough that I should ask additional questions?” We believe a predicted risk of 3.5% within 90 days is high enough to justify that extra attention.References1 Moyer VA: Medications to decrease the risk for breast cancer in women: recommendations from the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159:698–708Medline, Google Scholar2 Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al.: Statin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 2016; 316:1997–2007Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited byNone Volume 70Issue 7 July 01, 2019Pages 637-638 Metrics PDF download History Published online 1 July 2019 Published in print 1 July 2019

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.