Abstract

In research animals, the immune adjuvant activity of silicone in eliciting antibodies to associated protein antigens is now well established. In humans, the immune adjuvant activity of silicone remains controversial. Clusters of data from various research groups are beginning to define the boundary conditions for future large epidemiological studies. In that spirit, this manuscript reports pilot clinical data from a serological study conducted 3 years ago and reported previously in this journal. Sera from a self-selected symptomatic population of patients with breast implants were assayed for elevated concentrations of antibodies showing binding avidity to silicone surface associated antigens [anti-SSAA(x)]. In that study of 249 patients, two distinct statistically significant subgroups were identified on the basis of the serological assay alone: patients without any elevated anti-SSAA(x) (negative) and patients with elevated anti-SSAA(x) (positive) (p < 0.001). In this study, a clinical survey returned by 226 of those patients was correlated with the previously acquired serological findings. The 11 most common clinical complaints reported by the 199 anti-SSAA(x) negative patients and by the 27 anti-SSAA(x) positive were compared and their frequencies analyzed. The 199 anti-SSAA(x) negative patients, as a group, showed a lower frequency of a variety of signs and symptoms compared to the 27 anti-SSAA(x) positive patients. Statistically significant differences were seen in three of the symptoms: fever, foot pain, and sleep disturbance (p < 0.05). In addition, the syndrome of fever in the absence of local chest pain was a significantly associated with anti-SSAA(x) positivity (p < 0.001).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call