Self-Reported Feelings of Adult Patients With Differences of Sex Development (DSD) Regarding Genital Surgical Procedures

Abstract

Surgical approach of atypical genitalia according to adult patients with Differences of Sexual Development. Introduction: Differences of sexual development (DSD) define congenital diseases in which there is an atypical development of chromosomal, gonadal or anatomical sex, and may present varying degrees to genital atypia. There has been a discussion about the ideal time for surgical approach of atypical genitalia. S, because some non-governmental entities argue that the surgical approach should be delayed until adulthood after the patient's consent. Objective/methodology: To analyze the perspectives of adult DSD patients followed at a reference center in São Paulo on the surgical approach to correct atypical genitalia, through a semi-directed interview. Results: Thirty-seven adult patients with atypical genitalia were interviewed. Patients’ mean age was 36 years. 70% of them had atypical genitalia diagnosed at birth. The patients’ median age at the genitoplasty approach was 5 years (1 to 35 years). The median time interval between the beginning of the follow-up at the referral center and the surgical procedure was 1.9 years. When asked about the ideal period/age for genitoplasty, 72.2% considered the childhood, 16.7% cited when they’re teenagers, 8.3% in adulthood and 2.8% did n’t know. The discomfort reported by the patients related to atypical genitalia decreased after the surgical approach: from 3.8 to 2.9 p < 0.01 (on a scale of 1 “without discomfort’ to 4 “extreme discomfort”). Insecurity about the appearance of genitalia and functionality during sexual intercourse influences negatively affective relationships. Four (10.8%) patients presented gender dysphoria, all of them with 46 ,XY DSD, three with partial gonadal dysgenesis (all approached surgically before being admitted to our referral service) and one with 5-alpha-reductase 2 deficiency. Conclusion: Most 46 ,XY DSD patients considered childhood the ideal time to correct their atypical genitalia. An early follow-up in a reference center and an adequate evaluation by a multidisciplinary may influence the positive results associated to the surgical approach of the atypical genitalia in childhood and the low prevalence of gender dysphoria in adulthood.??