Abstract

We demonstrate the value of using the self-potential method to study volcanic environments, and particularly fluid flow in those environments. We showcase the fact that self-potential measurements are a highly efficient way to map large areas of volcanic systems under challenging terrain conditions, where other geophysical techniques may be challenging or expensive to deploy. Using case studies of a variety of volcano types, including tuff cones, shield volcanoes, stratovolcanoes, and monogenetic fields, we emphasize the fact that self-potential signals enable us to study fluid flow in volcanic settings on multiple spatial and temporal scales. We categorize the examples into the following three multiscale fluid-flow processes: (1) deep hydrothermal systems, (2) shallow hydrothermal systems, and (3) groundwater. These examples highlight the different hydrological, hydrothermal, and structural inferences that can be made from self-potential signals, such as insight into shallow and deep hydrothermal systems, cooling behavior of lava flows, different hydrogeological domains, upwelling, infiltration, and lateral groundwater and hydrothermal fluid flow paths and velocities, elevation of the groundwater level, crater limits, regional faults, rift zones, incipient collapse limits, structural domains, and buried calderas. The case studies presented in this paper clearly demonstrate that the measured SP signals are a result of the coplay between microscale processes (e.g., electrokinetic, thermoelectric) and macroscale structural and environmental features. We discuss potential challenges and their causes when trying to uniquely interpret self-potential signals. Through integration with different geophysical and geochemical data types such as subsurface electrical resistivity distributions obtained from, e.g., electrical resistivity tomography or magnetotellurics, soil CO2 flux, and soil temperature, it is demonstrated that the hydrogeological interpretations obtained from SP measurements can be better constrained and/or validated.

Highlights

  • Volcanic environments are fascinating and complex geological settings

  • We have briefly introduced various levels of complexity that exist in volcanic environments, affecting hydrology: complex geology, a strongly spatially varying and dynamically changing formation permeability/hydraulic conductivity, together with the presence of heat and heatdriven fluid motion

  • We present an overview of a variety of selfpotential field studies carried out in different volcanic environments, including shield volcanoes, monogenetic volcanoes, tuff cones, and stratovolcanoes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Volcanic environments are fascinating and complex geological settings. Besides activity that is directly visible at or above the surface, a lot of complicated, dynamic processes happen below the surface that determine the subsurface characteristics of the volcano, which in turn control, e.g., groundwater flow and local hydrology [1, 2]. As a consequence of the electrokinetic mechanism that generates SP signals (see more below), the SP method can provide unique insight into the actual fluid flow-paths [43] and distribution of Darcy flow velocities [44], thereby assisting in the identification of fracture networks and other zones of high or low permeability/hydraulic conductivity. We present an overview of a variety of selfpotential field studies carried out in different volcanic environments, including shield volcanoes, monogenetic volcanoes, tuff cones, and stratovolcanoes Based on these different case studies and the interpretation of the measured SP signals, we illustrate and discuss the variety of volcanic subsurface knowledge, as well as the breadth of information on porous medium fluid processes that we can extract and infer from these datasets, as well as highlight the demonstrated successes of using the SP method for studying volcanic environments. We will discuss several of these in greater detail below, thereby discussing some of the challenges and pitfalls for SP in volcanic environments

Method
Brief Theoretical Background for SP
Case studies
Deep Hydrothermal Systems
Monogenetic Volcano
Discussion and Conclusions
Disclosure
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call