Abstract

Background: The self-learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (Spanish acronym: MAES©, (Murcia, Spain) is a type of self-directed and collaborative training in health sciences. The objective of the present study was to compare the level of competence of postgraduate surgical nursing students in the clinical safety of surgical patients, after training with the MAES© methodology versus traditional theoretical–practical workshops, at different points in time (post-intervention, after three months, six months post-intervention, and at the end of the clinical training period, specifically nine months post-intervention). Methods: We conducted a prospective study with an experimental group of surgical nursing postgraduate students who participated in MAES© high-fidelity simulation sessions, and a control group of postgraduate nursing students who attended traditional theoretical–practical sessions at two universities in Catalonia (Spain). The levels of competence were compared between the two groups and at different time points of the study. Results: The score was higher and statistically significantly different in the experimental group for all the competencies, with a large effect size at every measurement point previously mentioned. Conclusions: The postgraduate nurses were the most competent in the clinical safety of surgical patients when they trained with the MAES© methodology than when they learned through traditional theoretical–practical workshops. The learning of surgical safety competencies was more stable and superior in the experimental group who trained with MAES©, as compared to the control group.

Highlights

  • The following research question was posed: Do postgraduate nurses perceive themselves as more competent in the clinical safety of the surgical patient when they are trained with the MAES© method than when they learn through traditional theoretical–practical workshops?

  • A prospective study was conducted with an experimental group of postgraduate surgical nursing students who participated in the high-fidelity MAES© simulation sessions, and a control group composed of postgraduate nursing students who participated in traditional theoretical–practical sessions

  • Postgraduate nurses are more competent in the safety of a surgical patient when they are trained with the MAES© methodology than when they learn through traditional theoretical–practical workshops

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This report guided the quality policies of the main international health organization for the development of strategies and recommendations that promoted the control of inevitable damages. This became especially important in the field of surgery, due to the complexity and risks of the perioperative process [2,3], and this is what the World Health Organization (WHO). The objective of the present study was to compare the level of competence of postgraduate surgical nursing students in the clinical safety of surgical patients, after training with the MAES© methodology versus traditional theoretical–practical workshops, at different points in time (post-intervention, after three months, six months post-intervention, and at the end of the clinical training period, nine months post-intervention). Conclusions: The postgraduate nurses were the most competent in the clinical safety of surgical patients when they trained with the

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.