Abstract

Previous studies on self-esteem and depression demonstrated the usefulness of both implicit and explicit self-esteem as well as their congruence (also known as self-esteem consistency) to predict future depressive symptoms. High self-esteem consistency describes when implicit and explicit self-esteem match (e.g., both high or both low). In the current study, we investigated if implicit and explicit self-esteem and self-esteem consistency predict the course of treatment efficacy of a cognitive behavioral depression therapy. Explicit self-esteem was assessed by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, implicit self-esteem by a priming task. Participants were 31 patients with a major depressive or recurrent depressive disorder receiving cognitive behavioral therapy treatment in an inpatient setting. Self-esteem measures were administered before treatment. The development of depression symptoms during treatment and at the 4-month follow-up was measured on the Beck Depression Inventory. Implicit and explicit self-esteem did not predict the course of the therapy. Patients with congruent self-esteem, however, improved faster and showed lower severity of symptoms throughout treatment. In contrast, neither explicit nor implicit self-esteem nor self-esteem consistency predicted the stability of effects after treatment. Practical implications such as targeting discrepancies in self-esteem during treatment are discussed.

Highlights

  • Depression is the most disabling type of mental disorders, and as primary and secondary diagnosis it is one of the most frequent reasons for starting a treatment in psychotherapy [1]

  • We investigated whether discrepant self-esteem in depressed patients is related to severity of symptoms, disadvantages concerning the course of therapy and stability of treatment effects

  • implicit self-esteem (ISE) scores did not significantly differ between patients with a major depressive disorder (M = 24.5, SD = 90.7) and patients with a recurrent depressive disorder (M = 1.5, SD = 106.1), t(29) = 0.64, p = .527, d = 0.24, yet there was a significant difference in ESE between patients with a major depressive disorder (M = 42.1, SD = 10.4) and patients with a recurrent depressive disorder (M = 32.0, SD = 7.0), t(29) = 3.22, p = .003, d = 1.20

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Depression is the most disabling type of mental disorders, and as primary and secondary diagnosis it is one of the most frequent reasons for starting a treatment in psychotherapy [1]. The impulsive system (based on implicit processes), can work sufficiently well even under conditions of very high mental load, and is more likely to control behavior when basic needs are deprived and when cognitive capacity is low (e.g., in stressful life situations or depressive moods) The interaction of both systems can explain the development and maintenance of depressive disorders [8]. For example, achieves this aim by inducing or reducing cognitive biases by means of classical and instrumental conditioning Taken together, both types of self-esteem have to be addressed in an adequate way to enable a successful therapy. Self-esteem consistency in depression not the extent of depressive symptoms was used as dependent variable It is still an open question how extent and direction of the discrepancy between ISE and ESE affect the intensity of depression and the therapy process. In an explanatory way, the effects of the direction of self-esteem discrepancy were examined

Participants
Procedure
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call