Abstract

Teachers with a high sense of efficacy have been found to be more passionate about teaching, ready to accept new ideas and make attempts to use new teaching methods to help students learn. Such teachers have positive teaching behaviors such as patience, commitment, enthusiasm, which in turn lead to positive student outcomes. However, research on teacher efficacy and classroom management is lacking in Botswana. The main aim of this study is to determine the extent of self-efficacy beliefs among final year students in all the teacher training colleges in Botswana, and to determine as to whether there are differences associated with gender, age and college. A total of 598 pre-service teacher trainees completed the quantitative survey. Self-efficacy was measured using the Long Form version of the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale which comprises of 24 items divided 3-subscales of 8 items each. The self-efficacy score for each student on each subscale was measured using the average score on the 8-items that make up the scale. Analysis of variance was used to investigate if self-efficacy depended on gender, age and college. The findings revealed that the level of self-efficacy was moderated among the trainees, averaging around 3.8 on a scale of 1 to 5. Self-efficacy increased with age for each subscale. Females outperformed males with respect to student engagement, but there were no significant gender differences with respect to instructional strategies and classroom management. There were significant differences between the five colleges with respect to each sub-scale, with one particular college having the lowest mean on all subscales, and another having the highest mean on all subscales. Interestingly the colleges that train primary had higher mean scores than those that train and secondary school teachers. However, further investigations revealed some partial confounding between age and school. The findings suggest that more efforts should be put into empowering pre-service teachers to develop self-confidence in class room management, instructional strategies and student engagement.

Highlights

  • During the 9th National Development Plan, the government of Botswana undertook “to offer equitable lifelong education and training that is relevant and responsive to the rapid technological development and changing socio-economic environment, and that produces knowledgeable, skilled, enterprising and independent individuals” (NDP 9, 2009, p. 268)

  • The sample consisted of 589 teacher-trainees with 162 from each of Molepolole (MCE) and Tonota (TCE) colleges of education and 109, 86 and 79 trainees from Serowe, Tlokweng and Francistown colleges of education respectively

  • Question 1: How do pre-service teachers in Botswana rate themselves in relation to the three subscales of Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy scale, (TSES) Efficacy in Student Engagement, Efficacy in Instructional Strategies and Efficacy in Classroom Management? For this section, respondents who said there is nothing or very little they can do were combined while those who had some influence or quite a bit of influence were combine for ease of interpretation of findings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During the 9th National Development Plan, the government of Botswana undertook “to offer equitable lifelong education and training that is relevant and responsive to the rapid technological development and changing socio-economic environment, and that produces knowledgeable, skilled, enterprising and independent individuals” (NDP 9, 2009, p. 268). In 2014, concerns regarding failing standards were so serious that a committee of the cabinet was sent around schools to determine first hand, the possible causes. The report from these visits has not been made public. Little research appears to have been conducted to establish the quality and training of the teachers involved and the contribution of teacher’s factors in the Botswana education system including poor performances of students at primary, junior and secondary schools. This state of affairs calls for www.ccsenet.org/jel

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.