Self-assessment of anatomy, sexual sensitivity, and function of the labia and vagina.

Abstract

Patient perceptions of genital esthetics are motivating requests for plastic surgeries that could change sexual sensitivity. There is little information about the sensitivities of labial and introital sites. The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between sexual sensitivity and self-reported sizes of labial and introital sites. Sixty-two healthy, sexually active, adult women (mean age 37.9, range 21-60) with no history of genital or vaginal surgery gave written consent to participate in this study. A modified version of Self-Assessment of Genital Anatomy and Sexual Function (L-SAGASF-F) was used to assess labial and introital size. Site-specific sensation was rated on Likert scales of 1-5. Anatomical locations were compared for ratings. Of 62 responders, 84% (52) described their labia as "average-sized," 11% (7) described their labia minora and 13% (8) their labia majora as "large", and 3% (2) and 5% (3) as "small". Sexual pleasure ratings were "moderate" (median value: 3.0 for external genitalia and vaginal lumen) or "strong" (median value: 4.0 for the interior vagina). Significantly higher rankings related to the vaginal opening (P=0.007). Orgasm intensity for stimulation of the external genitalia progressively increased toward the vaginal opening, from 1.0 to 3.0 (P=0.001); vaginal ratings showed a similar progression, from 2.0 at the external luminal margin to 3.0 in the deep interior (P<0.0001). Orgasm effort scores were intermediate (median: 3.0), uniform throughout the external and internal areas (P=0.626). Ratings for labial and introital sensitivity, regardless of self-reported size, were very similar to those at other genital sites for sexual pleasure. Surgical excision of labial and introital structures could modify sexual sensation.