Abstract

We complete here a three-part study (see also arXiv:1506.08095 and arXiv:1508.00856 ) of how codimension-two objects back-react gravitationally with their environment, with particular interest in situations where the transverse ‘bulk’ is stabilized by the interplay between gravity and flux-quantization in a dilaton-Maxwell-Einstein system such as commonly appears in higher-dimensional supergravity and is used in the Supersymmetric Large Extra Dimensions (SLED) program. Such systems enjoy a classical flat direction that can be lifted by interactions with the branes, giving a mass to the would-be modulus that is smaller than the KK scale. We construct the effective low-energy 4D description appropriate below the KK scale once the transverse extra dimensions are integrated out, and show that it reproduces the predictions of the full UV theory for how the vacuum energy and modulus mass depend on the properties of the branes and stabilizing fluxes. In particular we show how this 4D theory learns the news of flux quantization through the existence of a space-filling four-form potential that descends from the higher-dimensional Maxwell field. We find a scalar potential consistent with general constraints, like the runaway dictated by Weinberg’s theorem. We show how scale-breaking brane interactions can give this potential minima for which the extra-dimensional size, l, is exponentially large relative to underlying physics scales, r B , with l 2 = r 2 e − φ where −φ ≫ 1 can be arranged with a small hierarchy between fundamental parameters. We identify circumstances where the potential at the minimum can (but need not) be parametrically suppressed relative to the tensions of the branes, provide a preliminary discussion of the robustness of these results to quantum corrections, and discuss the relation between what we find and earlier papers in the SLED program.

Highlights

  • In this paper we study the very low-energy dynamics of six-dimensional supergravity interacting with two non-supersymmetric, space-filling, codimension-two branes

  • We here briefly outline the action and field equations of the UV theory whose low-energy description we wish to capture: the system studied in [2] consisting of a bulk EinsteinMaxwell-Dilaton sector that arises as the bosonic part of six-dimensional supergravity, plus two space-filling 3-branes situated within two transverse extra dimensions

  • This paper’s aim is to carefully determine how codimension-two objects in 6D supergravity back-react on their in environment through their interactions with the bulk metric, Maxwell field and dilaton, and how this back-reaction gets encoded into the effective potential of the low-energy 4D world below the KK scale

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In this paper we study the very low-energy dynamics of six-dimensional supergravity interacting with two non-supersymmetric, space-filling, codimension-two branes. As in two earlier papers [1, 2] we focus on systems for which the interactions are weak enough to ensure that the energetics lifting this flat direction are amenable to understanding in the effective 4D theory below the Kaluza-Klein (KK) scale We compute this low-energy potential explicitly within the classical limit, to identify how it depends on the various parameters describing the underlying UV completion. The purposes of doing so is to show how properties of the bulk physics (such as extra-dimensional size and on-brane curvature) are constrained by the field equations, which controls the extent to which they depend on the properties of any source branes This provides the tools required for matching to the 4D effective theory, relevant to energies below the KK scale. Our conclusions are summarized in a final discussion section, section 5

The higher-dimensional system
The bulk
Bulk geometry and field equations
Brane stress energies
Flux quantization The symmetry ansatz requires the 4-form field to satisfy
Boundary conditions
Control of approximations
Integral relations
Orders of magnitude
EFT below the KK scale
Lower-dimensional action
Field equations
Matching
Sources of φ-dependence within U
Implications of φ-independent tension
Perturbative solutions
Scenarios of scale
Robustness
Discussion
A Scale invariant solutions
Salam-Sezgin solution
Supersymmetric rugby ball
B Linearized solutions
C Examples of stabilization
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call