Abstract

PurposeWe assessed self-reported outcomes after the onset of puberty in patients undergoing tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair in combination with preputial reconstruction (PR) or circumcision for primary distal hypospadias, in comparison to normal controls. Material and methodsOut of 498 patients undergoing primary distal hypospadias repairs between 2001 and 2012, 83 underwent TIP repair associated with PR or circumcision before age 10-year, and had a Tanner stage ≥2 at study. Outcomes were assessed by online self-administration of validated questionnaires and additional non-validated questions. Results were compared between patients undergoing TIP repair vs. normal age-matched controls (healthy volunteers), and, between patients undergoing PR vs. circumcision. ResultsForty-one of the 83 eligible patients completed the study (response rate 49.3%). Of these, 26 had undergone PR. Median post-operative follow-up was 11.8 (range 6.5–16.2) years. The control group included 45 healthy boys. Comparing groups, there were no statistically significant differences in the cosmetic aspect of the penis, patient perception of penile appearance, and quality of life. Irrespective of preputial management, patients reported fear of being teased for the appearance of their genitalia much more commonly than controls (p = 0.02), but this did not affect their relationship patterns and quality of life. ConclusionSelf-reported outcomes after the onset of puberty were not significantly different between patients undergoing primary TIP repair of distal hypospadias in childhood and normal controls. Patients were significantly more commonly feared of being teased for their genital appearance, but this did not interfere with their social skills. Preputial management, namely PR vs. circumcision, did not affect the outcome.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call