Abstract

e20552 Background: Attending to symptoms and side effects promotes safe and effective delivery of cancer therapies. Educated and supported patients (Pts) may be able to self-manage symptoms (Sx) and know when to contact the clinician, avoiding emergency department visits (EDV) or hospital admissions (HA). The web-based Electronic Self Report Assessment for Cancer (ESRA-C) is an easy-to-use, automated program for assessing and teaching about symptom and quality of life issues (SQI) and has been shown to improve communication and reduce symptom distress over the course of active therapy. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to explore the impact of the ESRA-C intervention on rates of EDV and HA. Methods: AdultPts with all cancer types and stages treated in medical and radiation oncology at a comprehensive cancer center used ESRA-C to self-report SQI during new anti-cancer therapy, with summary reports delivered to clinicians. Patients were randomized to assessment-only ESRA-C (control) or the ESRA-C intervention adding self-monitoring and education and coaching between clinic visits. We analyzed group differences on EDV and HA using descriptive statistics and a two group unequal variance t-test. Results: Among 663 Pts, 34 out of 327 control Pts made 47 EDV vs 30 out of 336 intervention Pts made 42 visits. Likewise, 36 control Pts had 59 HA vs 36 intervention Pts who had 41 HA during the study duration. The majority of EDV (87%) and HA (88%) were Sx-related. The frequency of Sx-related events (EDV or HA) was higher in the control (n=94) vs the intervention group (n=71). The mean number of unplanned events were 0.29 and 0.21 per patient in the control and intervention groups, respectively (p=0.24). Conclusions: Although the trial sample size was not planned to test differences in EDV or HA, the ESRA-C intervention, compared with assessment alone, may have reduced symptom-related EDV and HA in a large sample of patients during active cancer treatment. If we are able to reduce Sx-related unplanned visits and admissions from more than 1 of 4 patients to 1 of 5 patients with an automated, patient-centered system, we can anticipate substantial cost savings when scaled to the volume of most comprehensive cancer centers. Clinical trial information: NCT00852852.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call