Abstract

The formation and stability of social hierarchies is a question of general relevance. Here, we propose a simple generalized theoretical model for establishing social hierarchy via pair-wise interactions between individuals and investigate its stability. In each interaction or fight, the probability of “winning” depends solely on the relative societal status of the participants, and the winner has a gain of status whereas there is an equal loss to the loser. The interactions are characterized by two parameters. The first parameter represents how much can be lost, and the second parameter represents the degree to which even a small difference of status can guarantee a win for the higher-status individual. Depending on the parameters, the resulting status distributions reach either a continuous unimodal form or lead to a totalitarian end state with one high-status individual and all other individuals having status approaching zero. However, we find that in the latter case long-lived intermediary distributions often exist, which can give the illusion of a stable society. As we show, our model allows us to make predictions consistent with animal interaction data and their evolution over a number of years. Moreover, by implementing a simple, but realistic rule that restricts interactions to sufficiently similar-status individuals, the stable or long-lived distributions acquire high-status structure corresponding to a distinct high-status class. Using household income as a proxy for societal status in human societies, we find agreement over their entire range from the low-to-middle-status parts to the characteristic high-status “tail”. We discuss how the model provides a conceptual framework for understanding the origin of social hierarchy and the factors which lead to the preservation or deterioration of the societal structure.

Highlights

  • Animals, including humans, form social hierarchies [1,2,3,4,5]

  • We have reviewed a number of measurable quantities that may serve as proxies for societal status in non-human animal groups and these are presented in Table B in S2 Appendix

  • We have presented a simple winner-loser model of the formation and evolution of social hierarchy, based solely on interactions between individuals that result in the transfer of societal status from the loser of the fight to the winner

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals, including humans, form social hierarchies [1,2,3,4,5]. How these hierarchies form and what makes them remain stable over time is a central question across many different fields. We compare data from observational studies on wins and losses in animal interactions with the results from simulations of our model, and we compare the distributions of societal status produced by the model with real-world social hierarchies. To make the latter comparison, we use proxies for societal status in large social groups. In our model, long-lived intermediary societal structures (distributions of societal status) arise independent of whether any pair of individuals are likely to interact or not In the latter case, status distributions with more complex shapes consistent with the household income proxy emerge. The article concludes with a summary of results and some comments regarding future research directions

Definition of the model
Model extension
Time-evolution and structure of status distributions
Definition of time and the characteristic time τ1
Overview of status distributions produced by the model
Long-lived behaviour
Status distributions in the extended model
Comparison of model results with real-world data
Agonistic interactions in small groups of animals
Proxies for status in large social groups
Discussion
72. Statistics Canada 2001 Census Public Use Microdata File

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.