Abstract

In this paper, we argue that a crucial component of ‘self-management’ as management of the self consists of reducing what John Sadler has called ‘self-illness ambiguity’ (Sadler 2007). The paper seeks to supplement Sadler’s view on self-illness ambiguity in two ways. First, we zoom out of self-illness ambiguity and provide a philosophical analysis of self-ambiguity more generally. We will argue that ambiguity may arise both on the level of (unreflective) self-experience as well as on the level of (reflective) self-understanding. Acknowledging these levels and their interplay enables us to see how self-ambiguity might arise and how it might be reduced or even resolved. Second, we zoom in on self-illness ambiguity and elucidate some of the contextual, conceptual and epistemological obstacles that may arise when trying to reduce self-ambiguities in a psychiatric context (such as self-illness ambiguity).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.