Abstract

Many of those working on construction sites are exposed to demanding work loads; construction workers lift and carry heavy materials and work in awkward postures. Occupational injuries and accidents due to poor ergonomics are more common in the construction industry and many times lead to human tragedies, disrupt construction processes and adversely affect the cost, productivity, and the reputation of the construction industry. In Sweden, it is reported that concrete workers have the highest relative work-related musculoskeletal injury frequency. Therefore, the use of ergonomic production methods to prevent this can have a significant human, social and financial impact. Research introduced here presents a case study of comparative analyses of ergonomic situations for concrete workers performing concrete casting processes. Three different ergonomic risk assessment methods were used to assess the physical strain, hand-arm vibration and noise affects risks involved in concrete casting work tasks. The combination of technical and managerial factors results in a system where workers are as efficient and safe as possible during their work tasks, and thus, makes the construction work environment sustainable. The aim of our research is to find practical methods to evaluate and compare two different concrete casting methods from an ergonomic perspective. The focus is on the production of cast-in-place concrete bridge constructions where the traditional concrete casting method is compared with the SCC (Self-Compacting concrete) casting method. To be able to identify work-related musculoskeletal injury risks due to concrete casting work tasks, QEC (Quick Exposure Check for musculoskeletal risks), PLIBEL (Checklist for identification for Ergonomics Hazards) and ErgoSAM (Ergonomic production technology method) methods were used. Ergonomic risks analysis methods QEC, PLIBEL and ErgoSAM have all shown capabilities to evaluate construction work activities and thus determine whether a construction work activity constitutes a musculoskeletal risk to the worker or not before any ergonomic intervention is introduced. As a result the present ergonomic risks emanating from work methods used in the traditional concrete placing can be significantly reduced with the use of self-compacting concrete (SCC) that eliminates awkward work postures, noise and hand arm vibration, thereby reducing if not eliminating musculoskeletal injuries among concrete workers during their concrete casting work tasks.

Highlights

  • The construction industry is one of the most significant in terms of impact on the health and safety issues of their workers and according to Fung et al (2008), the construction workers are at a higher risk of developing Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) than workers in other industries

  • Their involvement in the industry leads to pain and suffering associated with different occupational injuries such as WMSDs which account for 65 per cent of all injuries among construction workers (Samuelsson 2008)

  • Measurements from castings of two similar superstructures with approximately similar amount of reinforcement were used for the evaluation of the PLIBEL and Quick Exposure Check (QEC) checklists respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The construction industry is one of the most significant in terms of impact on the health and safety issues of their workers and according to Fung et al (2008), the construction workers are at a higher risk of developing WMSDs (work-related musculoskeletal disorders) than workers in other industries. In Sweden, between 2008 and 2009, 450,000 people were employed in the construction industry For many workers, their involvement in the industry leads to pain and suffering associated with different occupational injuries such as WMSDs which account for 65 per cent of all injuries among construction workers (Samuelsson 2008). Detecting injury risks of a construction site that could cause harm to workers is crucial for successful health and safety management, because a hazardous work environment affects workers health and safety and the time and cost of the project Promoting site health and safety is worth paying its financial costs rather than suffering from economical or production losses associated with a lack of health and safety, safety performance is perceived more and more as being an indicator of total operational efficiency in construction projects (Larcher, Sohail 1999; Fernández-Muñiz et al 2009)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.