Abstract

In this research, the feasibility of strengthening self-centering walls by high-performance concrete was investigated through an experimentally validated finite element model. The effects of the wall’s axial stress and tendons’ prestressing ratios on the wall’s damage, and the effectiveness of potential strengthening approaches were studied through 40 independent scenarios, and 360 different cases. Using the estimated damage from numerical results at the compression zone near the bottom corners, the maximum compressive strain of the concrete at the walls’ toe regions was estimated. Using the calibrated concrete strain, a practical approach was proposed to delimit both the walls’ damaged height and the crushed height. The heights’ information was used to investigate two potential strengthening approaches by either retrofitting (for damaged walls) or rehabilitating (for newly constructed walls). Increasing the axial stress ratio decreased the maximum developed compressive strain in the toe region, whereas the tendons’ prestressing ratio did not show significant effects. Moreover, by increasing substantially the axial stress ratio, the damaged region increased, whereas by increasing the tendons’ prestressing ratio the opposite effect was produced. Based on the findings of this research, it was concluded that for walls with lower axial stress ratio (< 0.095), both the proposed strengthening approaches resulted in similar outcomes, while for walls with higher axial stress ratio, casting the bottom portion with HPFRC led to sounder/safer designs.

Highlights

  • The use of post-tensioned lateral bearing structural systems, such as self-centering/rocking walls, has been receiving much attention due to their post-earthquake full-operability as well as negligible downtime and repair costs following seismic events [1, 2]

  • Due to the restoring forces developed in the unbonded post-tensioning (UPT) tendons, in self-centering walls, the structure’s residual drift was expected to be small and make the system robust and reliable especially for vital/critical infrastructures [1, 2]. It has been suggested in the literature that the single rocking walls’ (SRWs) axial stress and tendons’ prestressing ratios be the most influential parameters during seismic events [3, 53, 4–8]

  • Due to the lack of longitudinal rebars passing through the wall-foundation interface of the SRWs, when applying a sufficiently large lateral load to walls, a gap develops at the interface

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of post-tensioned lateral bearing structural systems, such as self-centering/rocking walls, has been receiving much attention due to their post-earthquake full-operability as well as negligible downtime and repair costs following seismic events [1, 2]. Due to the restoring forces developed in the unbonded post-tensioning (UPT) tendons, in self-centering walls, the structure’s residual drift was expected to be small and make the system robust and reliable especially for vital/critical infrastructures [1, 2]. It has been suggested in the literature that the single rocking walls’ (SRWs) axial stress and tendons’ prestressing ratios be the most influential parameters during seismic events [3, 53, 4–8]. Compressive stresses concentrate near one corner of the wall over the toe region, while the opposite corner experiences uplift (i.e., rocking mechanism) [9, 10]. Data obtained from the numerical investigations of SRWs, in the toe regions, could be used as a useful analytical tool [6, 11–13]

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call