Abstract

Each year, about 16 million people in the world experience a first-ever stroke. Of these, about 5.7 million die and another 5 million remain disabled.1 Although there are effective treatments that restore brain perfusion and minimize complications and recurrent stroke, there is no treatment proven to facilitate neurological recovery after stroke. A recent small trial demonstrated that the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine, commonly used to treat depression, improved motor recovery and reduced dependency after stroke when given to people without depression.2 Experimental studies reporting neurogenic and neuroprotective effects of SSRIs3,4 provide a plausible mechanism of action. Our objective was to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of all (published and unpublished) randomized controlled trials of SSRI compared with control, given within the first year of stroke, to determine the effect on dependency, disability, and other important clinical outcomes. ### Searches and Study Selection Extensive literature searches were performed between August 2011 and March 2012 (see Data in online-only Data Supplement); this included searching the gray literature. Two review authors scrutinized the searches of Cochrane Stroke Group, CENTRAL, CCDAN and the trials registers, and applied inclusion criteria. One review author scrutinized the other searches and applied inclusion criteria. We included all randomized controlled trials in patients with a clinical diagnosis of stroke, in which SSRIs were given within the first year of stroke, for any clinical indication. The control arm included usual care or a placebo. Any drug classified as an SSRI (for example fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, and paroxetine) given at any dose, by any mode of delivery, was included. Drugs with mixed effects were not included. Two review authors independently extracted data, except for papers in Chinese, for which 1 review author extracted data. ### Outcomes The primary outcomes were dependence and disability. The secondary outcomes were neurological …

Highlights

  • Subgroup analyses were performed according to type of SSRI, depression or not as an inclusion criterion and time since stroke at recruitment

  • Two hundred twenty-four full texts were retrieved for scrutinization (Figure 1)

  • Random allocation to SSRI was associated with reduction in dependency (74% SSRI versus 91% placebo; risk ratios (RRs), 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 0.97).[2]

Read more

Summary

Objectives

Our objective was to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials of SSRI compared with control, given within the first year of stroke, to determine the effect on dependency, disability, and other important clinical outcomes

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.