Abstract

In this study we tested whether a selective reward could affect the adaptation of saccadic eye movements in monkeys. We induced the adaptation of saccades by displacing the target of a horizontal saccade vertically as the eye moved toward it, thereby creating an apparent vertical dysmetria. The repeated upward target displacement caused the originally horizontal saccade to gradually deviate upward over the course of several hundred trials. We induced this directional adaptation in both right- and leftward saccades in every experiment (n=20). In half of the experiments (n=10), we rewarded monkeys only when they made leftward saccades and in the other half (n=10) only for rightward saccades. The reaction time of saccades in the rewarded direction was shorter and we, like others, interpreted this change as a sign of the reward’s preferential effect in that direction. Saccades in the rewarded direction showed more rapid adaptation of their directions than did saccades in the non-rewarded direction, indicating that the selective reward increased the speed of saccade adaptation. The differences in adaptation speed were reflected in changes in saccade metrics, which were usually more noticeable in the deceleration phases of saccades than in their acceleration phases. Because previous studies have shown that the oculomotor cerebellum is involved with saccade deceleration and also participates in saccade adaptation, it is possible that selective reward could influence cerebellar plasticity.

Highlights

  • IntroductionInjury and aging may cause movements to become inaccurate. When inaccuracies occur, the dysmetric movement gradually changes so it lands on target

  • Growth, injury and aging may cause movements to become inaccurate

  • Recent electrophysiological experiments allow us to speculate that the faster adaptation of saccade direction by reward we demonstrated here could be produced by the cerebellum

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Injury and aging may cause movements to become inaccurate. When inaccuracies occur, the dysmetric movement gradually changes so it lands on target. If saccades made to simple target steps in one direction are rewarded more than those in another direction, saccades associated with the larger reward have both shorter reaction times and faster velocities in both monkeys and humans (Takikawa et al, 2004; Hikosaka et al, 2006; Milstein and Dorris, 2007, 2011; Collins, 2012). These studies suggest that the motivation provided by a differential reward can influence saccadic responses. This observation is discussed in the context of the neural circuitry in the oculomotor cerebellum, which has been implicated in saccade adaptation (Catz et al, 2005; Soetedjo and Fuchs, 2006; Catz et al, 2008; Soetedjo et al, 2008b, a; Kojima et al, 2010b)

Experimental procedures
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call