Abstract

A random null model termed the blind-watchmaker network (BW) has been shown to reproduce the degree distribution found in metabolic networks. This might suggest that natural selection has had little influence on this particular network property. We investigate here the extent to which other structural network properties have evolved under selective pressure from the corresponding ones of the random null model: the clustering coefficient and the assortativity measures are chosen and it is found that these measures for the metabolic network structure are close enough to the BW network so as to fit inside its reachable random phase space. It is, furthermore, shown that the use of this null model indicates an evolutionary pressure towards low assortativity and that this pressure is stronger for larger networks. It is also shown that selecting for BW networks with low assortativity causes the BW degree distribution to deviate slightly from its power-law shape in the same way as the metabolic networks. This implies that an equilibrium model with fluctuating degree distribution is more suitable as a null model, when identifying selective pressures, than a randomized counterpart with fixed degree sequence, since the overall degree sequence itself can change under selective pressure on other global network properties.

Highlights

  • A network is a representation of whom or what is connected to, or influenced by, whom or what

  • The Blind Watchmaker network is the null model for a network of which one only has limited knowledge [16]: it is the most likely network structure for the given limited information

  • In this work we investigate the clustering-assortativity phase space of the Blind Watchmaker(BW) network model and compare to the real data of 107 metabolic networks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A network is a representation of whom or what is connected to, or influenced by, whom or what. This finding implies that evolutionary pressure has had little or no influence on the degree distribution, since there is no or very little deviation from the random null model which is presumed to describe the resulting structure in the absence of any selection.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call