Selective preimplantation pathological evaluation in renal transplantation: a single center's experience

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the clinical data of pre-implantation biopsy donors in our hospital and explore the clinical characteristics of those donors in pathological high-risk, and to provide references for the selective histological evaluation of extended criteria donor kidneys. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data and pre-implantation renal pathologic score of donors from January 1, 2015 to May 1, 2017.During this period, 247 cases of donation after citizen's death (DCD) occurred.After clinical evaluation and selective machine perfusion( Lifeport) evaluation, 30 cases of pre-implantation pathological evaluation were performed.According to Remuzzi scores, donors were divided into low-risk and high-risk group.Nine cases of low-risk group (bilateral kidney's Remuzzi score ≤3) and 16 cases of high-risk group (bilateral or unilateral kidney's Remuzzi score ≥4, severe glomerular micro-thrombi or severe tubular necrosis) were included.Five cases of donors were excluded due to only unilateral renal pathological result available.Both high-risk and low-risk groups' clinical data, including sex, age, height, body weight, body mass index, proteinuria, hematuria, urinary glucose, baseline or admission serum creatinine, serum creatinine before procurement, history of hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus, cardiopulmonary resuscitation or not, with or without the history of shock, urine output prior to acquisition, macroscopical manifestations of donor kidney, cause of death were statistically analyzed. Results: The donors' baseline serum creatinine/upper limit of normal serum creatinine range in high-risk group were significantly higher than that in low-risk group [(129.8±42.2)% vs(92.4±30.5)%, P=0.029]. The poor macroscopical manifestations of donor kidneys were significantly more frequent in high-risk group than that in low-risk group (12/16 vs 0/9, P= 0). No significant differences between two groups were found regarding their age, height, weight, BMI, proteinuria, hematuria, urine glucose, pre-procure creatinine level, history of hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus, cause of death and so on (P>0.05). Conclusions: After clinical evaluation and selective Lifeport evaluation, donor grafts of whose baseline serum creatinine levels increased beyond normal range and of whose grafts' macroscopical manifestations were poor, should undergo pre-implantation pathological evaluation further.Also, it is reasonable to perform pre-implantation biopsy in cases of equivocal results after Lifeport evaluation.This will be beneficial to identify histological high-risk donors and also be predictive to allocate the grafts.