Abstract

Objective: Open surgical treatment of carotid artery stenosis, namely, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), has evolved since its inception in 1953. Despite improvements in the treatment of carotid occlusive disease through technological and surgical innovations, the use of patch grafting in CEA’s remains controversial. We evaluate the durability of the primary closure and the safety of selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as determined by intraoperative EEG and postoperative outcomes.Methods: A consecutive series of CEA’s performed by the senior author at a single academic medical center from 2001 to 2012 were reviewed. All cases were performed under continuous intraoperative electroencephalography (EEG). Patch angioplasty was used in cases where there was tortuosity of the vessel within the region of the endarterectomy and narrow vessel diameter at the distal end of the arteriotomy. Shunting was used when intraoperative EEG showed a > 50% reduction in a waveform in any lead. Patients were evaluated for restenosis via imaging or ultrasound at six months and subsequently annual follow-up.Results: One hundred and forty-one CEA’s were performed on 132 (76 male, 56 female) patients with an average age of 71 years (range: 40–95 years). Four (3%) cases required patch angioplasty and three (2%) required intraoperative shunts. The cross-clamp time ranged from 22 to 74 minutes, and the duration increased with the use of shunts and patches. Complications were rare and included recurrent stenosis (n=2), postoperative transient ischemic attack (n=1), ischemic stroke in (n=1), temporary hypoglossal nerve weakness (n=2), temporary marginal mandibular nerve weakness (n=6), and neck hematoma (n=1).Conclusion: Intraoperative EEG data suggests that primary closure and selective shunting in CEA can result in outcomes comparable with routine patch angioplasty and shunting.

Highlights

  • IntroductionHow to cite this article Kapoor R, Evins A I, Marcus J, et al (October 28, 2015) Selective Patch Angioplasty and Intraoperative Shunting in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Single-Center Review of 141 Procedures

  • Open surgical treatment of carotid artery stenosis, namely, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), hasHow to cite this article Kapoor R, Evins A I, Marcus J, et al (October 28, 2015) Selective Patch Angioplasty and Intraoperative Shunting in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Single-Center Review of 141 Procedures

  • Primary closure versus patch angioplasty and selective versus routine shunting during CEA's have their respective risks and benefits, and patient outcomes should be used to evaluate the benefits and risks associated with different surgical techniques [12,13,14], including rate of restenosis, infection, myocardial infarction (MI), urinary tract infection (UTI), cerebrovascular accidents, and transient ischemic attacks (TIA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

How to cite this article Kapoor R, Evins A I, Marcus J, et al (October 28, 2015) Selective Patch Angioplasty and Intraoperative Shunting in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Single-Center Review of 141 Procedures. Despite improvements in the treatment of carotid occlusive disease through technological and surgical innovations, the use of patch grafting in CEA's remains controversial. Primary closure versus patch angioplasty and selective versus routine shunting during CEA's have their respective risks and benefits, and patient outcomes should be used to evaluate the benefits and risks associated with different surgical techniques [12,13,14], including rate of restenosis, infection, myocardial infarction (MI), urinary tract infection (UTI), cerebrovascular accidents, and transient ischemic attacks (TIA). We review 141 CEA's performed at our institution between 2001 and 2012 and evaluate the use of primary closure and selective shunting

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.